By Ron Moody
“It’s De ja Vu all over again,” Yogi Berra once
famously remarked in what has become history’s most famous redundancy.
When it comes to public access to public lands and
waters the latest hot news raises the ghost of the great Yogi – to suddenly
discover the lack of access to millions of acres of federal and state public
lands is de ja vu distilled to its bitterest essence.
A spate of news stories last
week were sparked by release of a new report by the Center for Western
Priorities (CWP). {http://www.westernpriorities.org/}
That study reveals (hold your breath here) that some 4
million public acres in states of the Rocky West were inaccessible to their
owners – the American people. For those western public estate activists who
have been around a few decades the question pops immediately to mind, “yes, and
your point is?”
In discussing the new report CWP’s Trevor Kincaid
reportedly observed: “As far as we know, we’re the only group that’s ever looked
into this.”
Sigh.
I’m delighted the report was developed and issued by
CWP. The news coverage it generates could conceivably make a difference,
somehow. But the actual information is infuriatingly old, old stinking news.
The public access barrier is all too familiar to
anybody wanting to use public lands and waters. CWP missed it but the federal
General Accounting Office, the investigative agency of Congress, completed a
nationwide survey of access to federal lands in April 1992. Yes, that’s the
22-years-ago 1992. The report number is GAO/RCED-92-116BR for anyone wanting to
look it up. The structure of the report was a national survey of local federal
land managers and was done at the request of Congressman Bruce Vento, then chair
of the House SubCommittee on National Parks and Public Lands.
In 1992, according to the GAO report, some 50.4 million acres, or about 14
percent, of the nearly 700 million total acres of federal land lacked public
access. Just counting fingers and toes I don’t come up with much progress over
the intervening generation of American citizens.
That 50.4 million-acre number isn’t going to shrink
over the next 22 years unless a few more locked-out citizens generate some
fire-in-the-belly about the loss of use of their property. The number of lost
acres could even increase.
How to solve the problem is almost as well understood
as is the knowledge of existence of the problem. A year after the GAO report
the Recreation Roundtable, a recreation industry group, recommended Congress
deliver a $50 million appropriation to access acquisition with $25 million each
to the Forest Service and BLM. Fat chance of getting that through Congress
today but it is a known action and would help.
Currently, activists are proposing a dedicated earmark
from the federal Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) to pay for access
acquisition. Since the House of
Representatives is preoccupied with totally defunding the LWCF so they can
further defund the national treasury, they are likely too busy to think of actually
paying for access acquisition.
And so it continues, year after year. And who is to blame?
I say ‘We The People’ are to blame. Politicians
frequently exhibit sensory loss, particularly to their hearing, but they can
smell a vote from a mile up wind. Solutions to the access problem will
magically become real when votes ride on access issues.
Meanwhile, back at the locked gate, one small group of
citizens has established a unique record of dedication to the public access
problem along with a string of successes in breaking locks to lands and waters.
That group is headquartered here in Montana and they
are the Public Land and Water Access Association (PLWA). You can find them at http://www.plwa.org/
I won’t go into their history in this column. But PLWA
stands on a side of the access issue that distinguishes them from other public
resource advocacy groups – they take action to open access instead of just
talking about it.
This makes PLWA greatly unpopular with those people
who either make money by locking up access or simply want to keep the public
treasure for themselves. As you might expect this leads to PLWA being a small
group since the average joe or jane has no stomach for being unpopular in
service to the public good.
In 1993, the magnitude of need to open access to
federal lands was about 28,000 easements. At that time the acquisition rate was
about 350 easements per year.
Whatever the number is today I predict it’s lower than
350.
At this rate of progress we will have to pay a toll
just to step off the pavement 20 years from now.
As a footnote I dedicate this column to memory of the late Paul
Berg of Billings Montana. In the later years of his life Paul showed up at
every public discussion of access issues in Montana and loudly demanded a
redress of the grievance while waving a copy of the 1992 GAO report and a copy
of the 1993 Recreation Roundtable report. Before his death Paul bequeathed his
copies of those reports to me with orders to keep waving them.
I’m afraid it’s been too long since I last followed those
instructions. But one good result of the new CWP report is that it made me dig
the copies out of my files and take them back in hand for future waving.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your take on the public land access issue. Getting access to "our" lands is a tough nut to crack.
US taxpayers, from 1995 to 2012, generously paid Montana farmers and ranchers $6.59 billion via various Federal farm subsidies. For the same period, in WY, taxpayers paid out $758 million. In many cases CRP payments have totaled more than the value of the land. It would have been cheaper to have bought the land outright! Also, farmers and ranchers are able to lease out their CRP lands, bringing in more income.
It seems reasonable that, in return for Federal payments, that farmers and ranchers should be required to allow access, through their properties, to public lands.
I have let our two US Senators and Representative know my thoughts on access but I'm sure we would agree that is like urinating in the wind.
What if thousands of sportsmen and women and hunting and fishing groups got on board with the idea? Quite possibility, over time, we might see some positive changes.
I support the PLWA and believe they are helping the cause, but they are limited in what they can do because of the costs incurred in legal battles with those closing public roads, etc.
Another issue is the "good ole boy" network of county commissioners who tend to side with their farming and ranching buddies. A prime example is the Maybee Road closure north of Roy.
Rome wasn't built in a day, so who knows what the future may bring re. more access to public lands? The question is how to develop the momentum and involvement for access so that we can see positive changes before we are too old and stiff to get out on those lands. I'm almost there.
Tom Darnell